Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41345409›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Soil communities following harvest have different early successional dynamics compared with post-wildfire patterns.

Teresita M Porter, Dave M Morris, Emily Smenderovac, Erik J S Emilson, Lisa Venier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Teresita M PorterNatural Resources Canada, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Sault Ste. Marie, Canada. terrimporter@gmail.com.
Dave M MorrisMinistry of Natural Resources, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.
Emily SmenderovacNatural Resources Canada, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Sault Ste. Marie, Canada.
Erik J S EmilsonNatural Resources Canada, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Sault Ste. Marie, Canada.
Lisa VenierNatural Resources Canada, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Sault Ste. Marie, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stand-replacing wildfire is the primary natural disturbance in jack pine-dominated boreal forests; but clearcut harvest also emulates this natural renewal process. We used a 60-year clearcut harvest chronosequence to assess whether soil communities became more similar to those in wildfire-origin stands over time. We assessed convergence across disturbance types at each stand development stage and recovery compared to the wildfire mature stand development stage (~ 85 years). To evaluate cumulative effects, we also assessed a 20-year salvage harvest chronosequence where wildfire was followed by salvage logging of fire-killed trees. Beta diversity analyses showed different recovery times among soil taxa. Following clearcut harvest, bacteria converged to wildfire reference conditions more quickly, followed by arthropods, whereas fungi did not converge within the study period. Soil communities in salvage-logged sites diverged from clearcut harvest and wildfire references suggesting compounded disturbance effects. This work showcases how highly-scalable DNA metabarcoding and bioinformatic tools can be applied to simultaneously monitor a diverse array of soil biota. In future work, tracking fungal and arthropod soil communities may provide more insights into the longer-term effects of current forest management practices and provide guidance when comparing alternative approaches.

Indexed as

SoilSoil MicrobiologyWildfiresAnimalsArthropodsBacteriaBiodiversityEcosystemForestsFungiSoilArthropodsBacteriaClearcut harvestDNA metabarcodingFungiSalvage logging

Identifiers

PMID41345409
PMCPMC12689615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.