ArticleBlood cancer journal2025
Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in a US healthcare claims database.
Article in Blood cancer journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glofitamab plus gemcitabine and oxaliplatin for relapsed/refractory DLBCL: 3-year follow-up of STARGLO.Blood advances · 2026Trial
- Mosunetuzumab Plus Polatuzumab Vedotin in Transplant-Ineligible Refractory/Relapsed Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Primary Results of the Phase III SUNMO Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Trial
- Indications for Autologous and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation in Adults: State of the Art.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Molecular Mechanisms of Resistance to Bispecific Antibodies in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Cells · 2026Review
- CAR T-cells in hematologic malignancies: Advances, challenges, and future directions.iScience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment options for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have expanded, but real-world data on treatment patterns and outcomes remain limited. This study examined real-world outcomes in DLBCL patients treated between 10/1/2015 and 6/30/2024. Patients were stratified by lines of therapy (LOT) and treatments (1L rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone [R-CHOP]; 2L stem cell transplant [SCT]; and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell [CAR T] therapy (any LOT). Variables were reported descriptively. Time-to-event outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. LOT data from 9875 patients were included. R-CHOP-based regimens were the most common 1L treatment (61.7%-67.3% in 2016-2023; 49.4% in 2024). Conventional chemoimmunotherapy use decreased in 2L (81.6% in 2016 to 41.9% in 2024) and 3L (47.6% in 2016 to 22.1% in 2024), while novel therapies increased (43.0% in 2L and 55.9% in 3L in 2024). Median overall survival declined across LOT (1L: 58.1 months; 2L: 30.0 months), as did median time to next treatment (1L: 36.1 months; 2L: 10.6 months). Twelve-month treatment failure rates were 36.0% after 1L, 51.8% after 2L, and 42.2% after CAR T. Among CAR T recipients, 93 received one of 36 distinct subsequent regimens, indicating no standard of care. These findings highlight the unmet needs in DLBCL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.