ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026
Effect of improvement in the endometrial microbiome on in vitro fertilization outcomes.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does Gut-Endometrial Immunomodulation Promote Pregnancy in IVF Patients with Recurrent Implantation Failure and Chronic Endometritis FollowingJournal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Bacterial Extracellular Vesicles: New Hype or Hope to Explain Reproductive Host-Microbiota Interactions.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe uterine microbiome of in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients was analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS) targeting 16S rRNA. Lactobacillus spp. were examined, with a special focus on Lactobacillus iners. The effects of antibiotic therapy on pregnancy outcomes were investigated.
methodsA total of 257 IVF patients underwent endometrial microbiome testing. Patients were initially classified based on the percentage of Lactobacillus spp. into the Lactobacillus-dominant microbiome (LDM) group and the non-LDM group using a cutoff of 90%. Treatment was provided to non-LDM patients. Treated patients who improved on the second test were included in the Post-treatment group, and their pretreatment status was also examined.
resultsLactobacillus was dominant in many IVF patients, but some patients showed Gardnerella or other bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis. The treatment improvement rate for the non-LDM group was 81.4%, with an equivalent or better pregnancy success rate compared with the LDM group. The effect on pregnancy outcomes of Lactobacillus may differ by species, with L. crispatus and L. gasseri tending to act positively, whereas L. iners at ≥ 74.2% acts negatively.
conclusionsThis study shows that the recovery of an LDM in non-LDM IVF patients improves the composition of the endometrial microbiome, and pregnancy outcomes approach those of patients initially having an LDM. Furthermore, in LDM cases, L. iners species were also associated with lower pregnancy rates. These findings suggest that both the presence and type of Lactobacillus species are important for IVF success and that targeted microbiome treatment may improve reproductive outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.