ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Physical and mental stress assessment during robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic assistance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves surgical precision but may alter intraoperative stress and workload among staff. This study evaluated these effects in 60 robot-assisted procedures involving surgeons, scrub technicians, circulators, and technicians. Preoperative stress was assessed using the STAI-6, intraoperative stress via heart rate, and postoperative workload, satisfaction, confidence, and team interaction through questionnaires. Preoperatively, most staff reported no anxiety, though newly introduced members showed severe anxiety in up to 15% of cases. Intraoperatively, stress patterns varied by role: surgeons peaked during implantation, scrub technicians and circulators during non-robotic phases, and technicians during robotic-specific steps, especially ligament balancing. The robotic arm did not increase surgeon stress but redistributed workload, reducing physical demands for scrub staff and circulators while raising responsibility for technicians. Postoperatively, satisfaction and confidence were high across groups, though scrub technicians reported the greatest workload from added robotic tasks. Robotic systems guided by dedicated professional personnel have the potential to reduce the intraoperative stress level of the whole surgical team, although it adds multiple additional steps to the traditional workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.