ReviewGene therapy2026
Precision rewriting of muscle genetics: therapeutic horizons of base and prime editing in skeletal muscle disorders.
Review in Gene therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Base Editing (BE) and Prime Editing (PE), novel precision tools of the CRISPR/Cas toolbox, have emerged as transformative technologies that enable highly specific genetic modifications. Their compatibility with post-mitotic cell types makes them invaluable for treating genetic skeletal muscle disorders. Despite their severity and progressive nature, monogenic muscle diseases remain without definitive treatments. They are caused by diverse mutations in critical muscle proteins, for which gene editing offers a promising therapeutic avenue. However, traditional CRISPR/Cas9 applications face challenges such as genotoxicity and inefficiency in post-mitotic tissues. BE and PE technologies overcome these limitations by enabling safe and efficient modifications without causing double-strand breaks or requiring homology-directed repair. Their therapeutic potential comes from two key features: their ability to work in non-dividing cells such as myotubes and cardiomyocytes, and their capacity to target a broad range of mutations found in genetic muscle diseases. In this review, we explore mechanisms of BE and PE and summarize their current applications in monogenic skeletal muscle disorders. We discuss the challenges of in vivo application in skeletal muscle and highlight innovations to bypass them. Collectively, both systems offer flexible precision solutions with immense potential for mutation-specific and personalized gene therapy approaches for monogenic skeletal muscle disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41345283What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.