SynthesisScientific reports2025
Effect of perioperative oral care on postoperative pneumonia in thoracic surgery patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative pneumonia (POP) is a prevalent and serious complication following thoracic surgery, substantially increasing morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of perioperative oral care (POC) in reducing the incidence of POP. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase from their inception through September 26, 2024. We included all observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the impact of POC on POP reduction. A total of 25 studies, involving 52,227 patients (24,964 in the POC group and 27,263 in the control group), were included in the final analysis, comprising 9 RCTs and 16 observational studies. The incidence of POP was 2,887 cases (11.6%) in the POC group, compared with 3,438 cases (12.6%) in the control group. The meta-analysis revealed that POC was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of POP in patients undergoing thoracic surgery (RR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.44-0.67; p < 0.001; I² = 72%). In conclusion, POC significantly reduces the incidence of POP in thoracic surgery patients, and its integration into perioperative protocols may improve clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.