ArticleScientific reports2025
Activated sludge recovered from wastewater provides a sustainable approach for removing dyes and heavy metals from effluents.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Activated Sludge in the Bioremediation of Water Containing SARS-CoV-2 Antivirals.Journal of xenobiotics · 2026Article
- Thermally activated paint-sludge as potential sustainable adsorbent for pollutant removal with insights from isotherms kinetics thermodynamics and response surface methodology.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Industrial wastewater is one of the most widespread sources of water pollution that cause increasing problems with heavy metals and dyes, which at the same time implies the find of sustainable and cost-effective treatment solutions. The current research was centred on the use of activated sludge that is obtained from the natural wastewater to remove both methylene blue (MB) dye and lead (Pb) ions from contaminated water. The SEM, EDS, FTIR, BET, XRD, and TGA analysis were used to characterize the structure and function of the activated sludge. The effect of pH, contact time, initial concentration, and sludge dosage on the removal efficiency was studied using the batch experiments. The activated sludge was most efficient at pH 6, 120 min contact time with 2 g/L sludge dosage. The steps of adsorption process have been best described by the pseudo-second-order kinetic model, in which physical attachment was found to be the major route. The results of isotherm studies showed that the best fitting model for the adsorption data was the Langmuir model, with the maximum adsorption capacities of 78.6 mg/g for MB and 52.3 mg/g for Pb. The sludge also showed appreciable regeneration, with over 80% of the adsorption capacity left after it had completed the fifth cycle. The findings thus put forward the idea of using naturally occurring activated sludge from wastewater as a sustainable, low-cost, and efficient biosorbent for the treatment of water polluted with dyes and heavy metals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.