Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41345201›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluation of CMIP6 model performance and future climate projections over the Genale dawa river basin, Ethiopia.

Fetene Muluken Chanie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fetene Muluken ChanieDepartment of Meteorological Data and Climatology, Ethiopian Meteorology Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. fetenemule@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Genale Dawa River Basin (GDRB) in southeastern Ethiopia is highly vulnerable to climate variability. However, limited research has examined how well the latest CMIP6 climate models simulate key climate variables in this complex, data-scarce region. This study evaluates 12 CMIP6 Global Climate Models (GCMs) in reproducing historical precipitation, maximum temperature (Tmax), and minimum temperature (Tmin) over the GDRB for 1985-2014, and projects future changes for 2021-2050 and 2051-2080 under SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios. Observational data from ENACTS and 60 ground-based stations were used to validate model outputs, which were resampled to 0.05° × 0.05° resolution and bias-corrected using quantile mapping. Model performance was evaluated using Mean Bias Error (MBE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Pearson correlation, and Taylor Skill Score (TSS). The multi-model ensemble (MME) outperformed individual GCMs, achieving TSS values of 0.80 for precipitation, 0.98 for Tmax, and 0.99 for Tmin. Among individual models, CNRM-CM6-1 performed best for precipitation, GFDL-CM4 and NorESM2-MM for Tmax, and FGOALS-g3 and MRI-ESM2-0 for Tmin. Most models reproduced observed spatial and temporal patterns well but showed a systematic cold bias in Tmin, while Tmax was more accurately simulated. Under the SSP5-8.5 mid-century scenario, Tmax and Tmin are projected to increase by about 1.8 °C, and precipitation by 11.1% (5.4 mm). These findings demonstrate the value of ensemble-based projections and robust model evaluation for improving climate risk assessment and adaptation planning in the GDRB.

Indexed as

Climate changeClimate projectionsCMIP6 modelGenale dawa river basin

Identifiers

PMID41345201
PMCPMC12770424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.