ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of CMIP6 model performance and future climate projections over the Genale dawa river basin, Ethiopia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Genale Dawa River Basin (GDRB) in southeastern Ethiopia is highly vulnerable to climate variability. However, limited research has examined how well the latest CMIP6 climate models simulate key climate variables in this complex, data-scarce region. This study evaluates 12 CMIP6 Global Climate Models (GCMs) in reproducing historical precipitation, maximum temperature (Tmax), and minimum temperature (Tmin) over the GDRB for 1985-2014, and projects future changes for 2021-2050 and 2051-2080 under SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios. Observational data from ENACTS and 60 ground-based stations were used to validate model outputs, which were resampled to 0.05° × 0.05° resolution and bias-corrected using quantile mapping. Model performance was evaluated using Mean Bias Error (MBE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Pearson correlation, and Taylor Skill Score (TSS). The multi-model ensemble (MME) outperformed individual GCMs, achieving TSS values of 0.80 for precipitation, 0.98 for Tmax, and 0.99 for Tmin. Among individual models, CNRM-CM6-1 performed best for precipitation, GFDL-CM4 and NorESM2-MM for Tmax, and FGOALS-g3 and MRI-ESM2-0 for Tmin. Most models reproduced observed spatial and temporal patterns well but showed a systematic cold bias in Tmin, while Tmax was more accurately simulated. Under the SSP5-8.5 mid-century scenario, Tmax and Tmin are projected to increase by about 1.8 °C, and precipitation by 11.1% (5.4 mm). These findings demonstrate the value of ensemble-based projections and robust model evaluation for improving climate risk assessment and adaptation planning in the GDRB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.