Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41345199›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Performance evaluation of microbial fuel cell using ceramic anode blended with rice husk ash and mild steel dust.

Kumar Sonu, Monika Sogani, Zainab Syed, Jayana Rajvanshi, Nishan Sengupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kumar SonuDepartment of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, 208016, India.
Monika SoganiDepartment of Biosciences, Manipal University Jaipur, Rajasthan, 303007, India. monika.sogani@jaipur.manipal.edu.
Zainab SyedDepartment of Zoology, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302004, India.
Jayana RajvanshiDepartment of Biosciences, Manipal University Jaipur, Rajasthan, 303007, India.
Nishan SenguptaDepartment of Biosciences, Manipal University Jaipur, Rajasthan, 303007, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial fuel cell (MFC) technology effectively addresses the dual challenges of wastewater treatment and energy generation, but its widespread application is restricted by the high cost of electrodes. To overcome this, the present study developed a low-cost ceramic anode by blending rice husk ash, mild steel dust, and soil, with the dual objective of treating dye-laden industrial effluents and generating bioelectricity. Two identical MFC configurations were operated using real textile dye wastewater (COD: 2,600 mg/L): one with a ceramic matrix anode containing 50% rice husk ash (MFC 1) and the other without rice husk ash (MFC 2). MFC 1 achieved a maximum open circuit voltage of 958 mV, power density of 250 mW/m², coulombic efficiency (CE) of 2.98%, COD removal efficiency of 88%, and color removal efficiency of 92%, outperforming MFC 2 (577 mV, 86 mW/m², 1.74%, 67%, and 72%, respectively). The incorporation of rice husk ash enhanced anode porosity and microbial attachment, while mild steel dust improved conductivity and mechanical stability. Our findings highlight the potential of rice husk ash and mild steel dust in ceramic anode as a low-cost, sustainable alternative to conventional electrodes for scaling up MFCs in industrial wastewater treatment and bioenergy recovery.

Indexed as

Bioelectric Energy SourcesCeramicsDustOryzaSteelElectricityElectrodesWastewaterDustSteelWastewaterBioelectricityCeramic anodeMicrobial fuel cellMild steel dustRice husk ash

Identifiers

PMID41345199
PMCPMC12706019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.