ArticleScientific reports2025
A hybrid contrastive graph neural network framework for fake news and hate speech detection using content and user interaction signals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detecting fake discussions and aggressive speech on social platforms remains a complex task due to evolving user dynamics and the minimal overlap between normal and harmful content. Traditional detection methods lag in classifying these contents as they focus only on textual features or user behavior. This leads to limited performance specially in sparse interaction environments. To overcome these limitations a hybrid graph-based classification model is proposed in this research work which incorporates semantic, behavioral, and contextual data into a combined architecture. The proposed system models content and users as nodes, with interaction types such as replies, mentions, and shares to create a forming weighted edges based on temporal and behavioral factors. Also, a contrastive strategy is incorporated to differentiate the aligned and conflicting user-content associations. The textual representation in the comments is captured using a semantic encoder and the relational dependencies are modeled through graph attention layers which further enhanced with metadata like credibility scores and user activity. Experimental evaluations using the FakeNewsNet dataset confirm the proposed model superior performance through the attained 97.12% accuracy which is superior over conventional methods like GRU-MCAF (94.82%) and Attention-LSTM (93.57%). The proposed model also recorded the highest F1-score of 96.43%, precision of 96.72%, and recall of 96.15% which indicates the model consistent classification across labels over conventional methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.