Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41345191›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Weakly supervised regression enables interpretable tumor detection in whole-slide histopathology without negative cases.

Marina D'Amato, Jeroen van der Laak, Francesco Ciompi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marina D'AmatoComputational Pathology Group, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. marina.damato@radboudumc.nl.
Jeroen van der LaakComputational Pathology Group, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Francesco CiompiComputational Pathology Group, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Innovative Medicines Initiative 945358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate tumor detection in digital pathology whole-slide images (WSIs) is crucial for cancer diagnosis and treatment planning. Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) has emerged as a widely used approach for weakly-supervised tumor detection with large-scale data without the need for manual annotations. However, traditional MIL methods often depend on classification tasks that require tumor-free cases as negative examples, which are challenging to obtain in real-world clinical workflows, especially for surgical resection specimens. We address this limitation by reformulating tumor detection as a regression task, estimating tumor percentages from WSIs, a clinically available target across multiple cancer types. In this paper, we provide an analysis of the proposed weakly-supervised regression framework by applying it to multiple organs, specimen types and clinical scenarios. We characterize the robustness of our framework to tumor percentage as a noisy regression target, and introduce a novel concept of “amplification technique” to improve tumor detection sensitivity when learning from small tumor regions. Finally, we provide interpretable insights into the model’s predictions by analyzing visual attention and logit maps. Our code is available at https://github.com/imi-bigpicture/tumor-percentage-mil-regression .

Indexed as

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedNeoplasmsSupervised Machine LearningAlgorithmsHumansMultiple-Instance Learning AlgorithmsRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID41345191
PMCPMC12678448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.