ArticleScientific reports2025
A data driven comparison of hybrid machine learning techniques for soil moisture modeling using remote sensing imagery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Explainable Quantile CNN-LSTM model for uncertainty-aware multi-layer soil moisture prediction in tropical cocoa plantations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soil moisture plays a very important role in agricultural production, water and ecosystem well-being particularly in rain-fed areas such as Tamil Nadu, India. This study evaluates and compares the performance of eleven machine learning models, Linear Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting (GB), XGBoost (XGB), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Long Short-Term Memory tuned with Ant Lion Optimizer (LSTM-ALO), LSTM optimized with the weighted mean of vectors optimizer (LSTM-INFO), Random Vector Functional Link optimized using Enhanced Reptile Optimization Algorithm (RVFL-EROA), Artificial Neural Network optimized via Elite Reptile Updating Network (ANN-ERUN), and Relevance Vector Machine tuned with Improved Manta-Ray Foraging Optimization (RVM-IMRFO) for predicting monsoon-season soil moisture using rainfall and topographic parameters (slope, aspect, and Digital Elevation Model (DEM)). The models were trained using rainfall data from the India Meteorological Department (IMD) and high-resolution soil moisture datasets. Model performance was assessed using Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE), and Combined Accuracy (CA). Among all models, XGBoost and Random Forest achieved the highest accuracy (RMSE = 0.018-0.019 m³/m³; NSE ≈ 0.983-0.984; KGE ≈ 0.988), followed closely by ANN and ANN-ERUN (RMSE ≈ 0.020 m³/m³; NSE ≈ 0.980). The hybrid models RVFL-EROA and RVM-IMRFO demonstrated moderate performance (RMSE = 0.045-0.052 m³/m³; NSE = 0.87-0.90), while LSTM-ALO and LSTM-INFO performed relatively lower due to optimizer sensitivity and data non-stationarity. Error distribution and scatter plots confirmed that ensemble and metaheuristic-enhanced models effectively captured the non-linear soil moisture variability in topographically diverse regions. This evidence shows that ANN-ERUN, RVFL-EROA and RVM-IMRFO as hybrid metaheuristic learning methods can be used to complement ensemble models like XGBoost and Random Forest to estimate soil moisture in data-sparse, heterogeneous landscapes. Higher-level hybrid tuning strategies and longer-term models should be investigated in future research in an effort to promote predictive robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.