Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41345168›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A simple behavioral evaluation test of human face identity recognition with natural images validated with the case of prosopagnosia PS.

Angélique Volfart, Caroline Michel, Bruno Rossion

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Angélique VolfartDepartment of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Social and Educational Sciences, Institute of Cognitive Science and Assessment, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Caroline MichelPsychological Sciences Research Institute (IPSY), Université de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Bruno RossionPsychological Sciences Research Institute (IPSY), Université de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. bruno.rossion@univ-lorraine.fr.

Funding

European Research Council HumanFace 101055175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral evaluation of face identity recognition (FIR) ability has been performed with images for decades but remains subject to challenges regarding the stimuli and tasks used as well as the measured variables. Here we validate two simple nonverbal tests of FIR with ambient natural face images in neurotypical individuals and the well-documented brain-damaged case of prosopagnosia PS. In the first task, participants must select a famous identity among 3 simultaneously presented pictures. While neurotypical individuals scored almost at ceiling, PS was at chance level. In contrast, she was flawless at the same task with written names. The second task requires matching different views of familiar or unfamiliar faces for their identity against one distractor face, at upright or inverted orientation. While performing well above chance level, PS was significantly impaired and slowed down compared to neurotypical controls. Moreover, unlike controls, she showed no advantage for familiar or upright faces. Altogether, these simple behavioral FIR tests present with numerous advantages in terms of validity (i.e., natural images, lack of response biases, familiarity and inversion effects) and sensitivity (i.e., high contrast between patients and controls), making them particularly advantageous to rapidly evaluate the integrity of this function in normal and pathological populations.

Indexed as

FaceFacial RecognitionProsopagnosiaRecognition, PsychologyAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationFace identity recognitionNatural imagesProsopagnosiaPSSingle case

Identifiers

PMID41345168
PMCPMC12678428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.