Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41345167›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluation of various traditional machine learning techniques for predicting the acute effect of different hamstring muscle stretching methods among male soccer players.

Elham Hosseini, Mohammad Alimoradi, Mojtaba Iranmanesh, Sahar Zaidi, Arian Azizian, Andreas Konrad, Hadis Mohseni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elham HosseiniDepartment of Sports Injuries and Corrective Exercises, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
Mohammad AlimoradiDepartment of Sports Injuries and Corrective Exercises, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
Mojtaba IranmaneshDepartment of Sports Injuries and Corrective Exercises, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
Sahar ZaidiDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Nursing Sciences and Allied Health, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India.
Arian AzizianDepartment of Computer Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.
Andreas KonradInstitute of Human Movement Science, Sport and Health, Graz University, Graz, A- 8010, Austria. andreas.konrad@uni-graz.at.
Hadis MohseniDepartment of Computer Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the acute effects of static (SS), dynamic (DS), and ballistic (BS) hamstring stretching on performance in male soccer players and applied machine learning (ML) to predict protocol efficacy. A total of 249 players with and without hamstring shortening completed each protocol across three sessions with 72 h of rest. Hamstring shortening classified via passive knee extension test (> 32.2° knee angle). Flexibility, strength, sprint, power, and agility were measured pre- and post-stretching. Each protocol: 4 sets × 30 s (holds/swings/bounces at 50-60 bpm), 10 s rest. ML models (k-NN, SVM, random forest) were trained on pre-post difference scores, with feature selection applied to identify key predictors and Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique used to address class imbalance. Findings indicate SS optimally acutely improves flexibility, whereas DS offers broader immediate performance benefits for a subsequent activity. Combining feature selection and data balancing increased k-NN accuracy to 53% (only ~ 20% points above the chance level of 33.3% for this three-class problem), highlighting methodological challenges in predicting individual responses. Exploratory analysis using ML using synthetic minority over-sampling technique reached a peak accuracy of 53.06% (compared to a baseline of 33.3%), demonstrating the promise of the approach but also highlighting the challenges of applying ML to predict individual responses to stretching interventions, underscoring the need for larger datasets and more advanced models.

Indexed as

Hamstring MusclesMachine LearningMuscle Stretching ExercisesSoccerAdultAthletesAthletic PerformanceHumansMaleMuscle StrengthYoung AdultAthletic performanceHamstring musclesStretching exercisesSupervised machine learning

Identifiers

PMID41345167
PMCPMC12678761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.