ArticleScientific reports2025
Factors affecting colonization and assemblage structure of fish in newly created ponds.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The construction of new ponds is a widely used mitigation measure in wetland restoration. While fish colonization can compromise their ecological function, knowledge of how frequently, how rapidly, and by which mechanisms fish colonize these habitats is severely limited. In our study of 123 newly created, originally fishless ponds in the Central European agricultural landscape, 58.5% were found to host fish. Fish were already present in 40% of one-year-old ponds and the proportion of non-colonized ponds did not depend on their age. The most common species were the invasive topmouth gudgeon (Pseudorasbora parva) and Prussian carp (Carassius gibelio), along with the native rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus). The likelihood of fish colonisation increased with pond area and depth but decreased with the width of littoral vegetation and distance from the nearest settlement, the latter suggesting a strong effect of anthropogenic dispersal. Ponds hosting invasive or stocked fish assemblages exhibited significantly reduced water transparency and submerged macrophyte cover, indicating potential negative impact on their biodiversity. Overall, the study highlights that without effective control of fish dispersal, newly created ponds in agricultural landscape risk losing much of their conservation value and, in some cases, may even facilitate the persistence and spread of invasive species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.