ArticleScientific reports2025
Improving the performance of daily pan evaporation (Ev
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a novel approach for the prediction of daily pan evaporation (Evp) based on identifying an optimal combination of model inputs. The Kardeh Dam catchment area in northeastern Iran, where significant evaporation occurs, was investigated in this study. Initially, an appropriate combination of inputs was identified through the gamma test and genetic algorithm (GTGA). Using the ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD), each input data was converted into intrinsic mode functions (IMFs), which were then used as input to long short-term memory (LSTM) and convolutional neural network (CNN) models. The model inputs considered in this work for predicting pan evaporation included maximum and minimum temperature, precipitation, and evaporation in earlier stages. Each input variable was transformed into nine IMFs, simplifying the complex pattern of input variables and leading to improved performance of both CNN and LSTM models. The prediction results using the CNN exhibited RMSE, MAE, and SI values equal to 0.33 mm, 0.24 mm, and 0.06, respectively. Using the LSTM, these values were equal to 0.043 mm, 0.11 mm, and 0.016, respectively. The proposed methodology can be applied in various regions for improved evaporation prediction, offering decision-makers and researchers a clearer understanding of future evaporation trends to effectively manage water resources and prevent wastage of water, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.