ArticleScientific reports2025
Comprehensive chemical profiling and bioactivity assessment of Porodaedalea pini and Phellinus tremulae.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fruiting bodies of the fungi Porodaedalea pini (Brot.) Murrill and Phellinus tremulae (Brot.) A. Ames were collected in the Białowieża Forest (Poland). Morphological identification of the collected fruiting bodies was carried out and genetic tests were performed to confirm the identity of the collected specimens. Methanol extracts for biological activity tests were prepared. The methanolic extracts obtained had a plastic consistency, high viscosity and colors from brown to dark brown. The determination of selected elements in Phellinus extracts was performed by X-ray spectrofluorimetry. Thermal decomposition studies and spectroscopic analysis of the dry fruiting bodies were performed. The content of active substances was examined using GCMS chromatography. GCMS analysis showed that the extracts of the tested species contain many chemical compounds that are characterized by high antioxidant potential. These include, among others, phenolic acids (caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, 3-hydroxybenzoic acid). In the extract of P. pini, the content of phenolic acids is higher than in P. tremulae. The P. tremulae extract (83.70+/-1.00%) possesses similar antiradical activity against DPPH• as P. pini extract (80.00+/-0.58%). The extracts were tested for their antimicrobial activity against multi-resistant bacteria. Cytotoxic activity was also tested. Both extracts inhibited the growth of S. aureus 4459 (MIC = 6.25 mg/ml), the clinical strain resistant to erythromycin. Cytotoxicity assessment showed that only the P. tremulae extract significantly decreased HaCaT cell viability by 37% and 42% at concentrations of 400 and 800 µg/ml, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.