Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41345142›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Unveiling plant protein astringency perception through neural and cellular responses.

Ben Kew, Melanie Rose Burke, Markus Stieger, Yunqing Wang, Christine Boesch, Melvin Holmes, Anwesha Sarkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ben KewFood Colloids and Processing Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. B.J.Kew@leeds.ac.uk.
Melanie Rose BurkeSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. m.r.burke@leeds.ac.uk.
Markus StiegerDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, PO Box 17, Wageningen, 6700 AA, The Netherlands.
Yunqing WangNutritional Sciences and Epidemiology Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Christine BoeschNational Alternative Protein Innovation Centre (NAPIC), Leeds, UK.
Melvin HolmesFood Colloids and Processing Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Anwesha SarkarFood Colloids and Processing Group, School of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. A.Sarkar@leeds.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/Z516119/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While consumption of plant proteins providing nutritional, social and climate solutions to feed a growing population in a healthy and sustainable manner is unquestionable, astringency remains a persistent yet underestimated organoleptic challenge. This longstanding issue, contributing to a sensation of dryness, serves as a major bottleneck in the development of plant-based foods with broad consumer acceptance. Here, we investigate experimentally the origin of astringency in plant proteins probing sensory, neural, and cellular responses. Strikingly, by combining sensory profiling with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and saliva and mucin-coated oral epithelium-mimicking cell lines, we identify that plant protein astringency demonstrates a distinct prefrontal cortex neural response and is associated with salivary mucin-binding, drawing parallels to tannin-like responses. Our mechanistic dissection fuelled by in vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo experimental studies pinpoints direct quantitative evidence uncovering previously uncharacterised astringency of plant proteins, paving the way for solving the sensorial challenges in the era of transitioning towards eco-friendly plant protein-based foods.

Indexed as

AstringentsPlant ProteinsTasteTaste PerceptionAdultAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleMouth MucosaMucinsPrefrontal CortexSalivaAstringentsMucinsPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID41345142
PMCPMC12678544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.