ArticleScientific reports2025
Spike train analysis in rehabilitation movement classification using deep learning approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Full-Stack Architectures for Intelligent Brain-Computer Interfaces.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid advancement of sensor technologies has sparked significant interest in intelligent physiotherapy monitoring systems, which hold immense potential for improving assessment quality. Despite this promise, existing sensor technologies for physiotherapy evaluation often need to be expanded in their versatility and robustness. This research introduces an innovative approach using spike train feature extraction to enhance patient progression tracking for physiotherapy assessment. developed a novel approach that reveals distinctive patterns for each physiotherapy exercise by implementing spike trains as the primary feature extraction method. The methodology used three datasets: UI-PRMD, K3Da, and a Self-Collected dataset, which were encoded into spike train formal representations, generating around 415 unique spike patterns. The study uses raster plot patterns as inputs for a sophisticated Deep Learning framework to assess pattern uniqueness. A key innovation was utilising spike occurrence frequency (firing rate) to differentiate movement correctness, where the derived mean error percentage (MPE) was used as a supportive metric complementing the classification process, and validated against DL evaluation metrics. The proposed framework demonstrated exceptional performance, achieving recognition rates of 99.44% (UI-PRMD), 98.21% (K3Da), and 100.00% (self-collected datasets) across various convolutional neural network architectures. Comprehensive evaluation metrics were used to validate the effectiveness of the rehabilitation movement assessment, including accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Spike-train encoding combined with a tailored CNN is promising for physiotherapy movement recognition and correctness assessment, but clinical utility remains provisional and requires validation in patient populations like stroke and Parkinson’s disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.