ArticleNature communications2025
Graded encoding of spatial novelty scales in the human brain.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterizing functional connectivity gradients for the hippocampus-amygdala complex in healthy and psychiatric cohorts.Brain structure & function · 2026Article
- Graded encoding of spatial novelty scales in the human brain.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Successful navigation relies on the ability to process and encode detailed information about our dynamic environments. Beyond familiarity, emerging studies now highlight the crucial role of novelty detection in this process, the precise neural mechanism of which remains poorly understood. Using ultra-high field 7T fMRI, we investigated how the human brain encodes spatial novelty during virtual navigation, with a particular focus on graded representations that follow systematic transitions between novel and familiar spaces. Our results revealed novelty and familiarity specific neural responses within the posterior and anterior poles of the bilateral hippocampus, respectively. On the cortical surface, two separable streams of activity patterns were observed in which regions within the visual and frontoparietal networks showed novelty-specific activity, while somatomotor, ventral attention and default mode regions preferred spatial familiarity. Importantly, we identified a distinct gradient along the hippocampal long axis and demonstrated the extended contribution of the posterior medial cortex to the encoding of spatial novelty scales that were intrinsically coupled with the hippocampal gradient. These findings advance our understanding of how the human brain encodes and processes spatial information, suggesting that graded representations of spatial novelty may serve as a fundamental organizational principle for spatial cognition in the human brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.