Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41345092›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Macroevolutionary brain scaling is a microevolutionary metaphenomenon.

Joanna Baker, Robert A Barton, Chris Venditti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joanna BakerSchool of Life, Health and Chemical Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, UK. joanna.baker@open.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4904-6934
Robert A BartonDepartment of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2150-9637
Chris VendittiSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK. c.d.venditti@reading.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6776-2355

Funding

Leverhulme Trust RL-2019-012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From bees to blue whales, it has long been assumed that brain size scales with body size according to a simple log-linear relationship - with differences in the slope and intercept observed amongst different groups of animals. However, recent analyses in mammals contradict this view, revealing size dependency in the form of curvature in the brain and body mass relationship. Here, we use data from 4679 species across seven animal classes and spanning nearly 12 orders of magnitude to uncover near universal curvilinearity. We demonstrate that this body size dependence is a metaphenomenon emerging from a pattern of diminishing allometry within species with increasing body mass. This has fundamental implications for how we interpret macroevolutionary patterns - which can arise as a consequence of within-lineage dynamics. Our integration of inter- and intra-specific allometries reshapes perspectives on morphological evolution by providing a broader framework for understanding how microevolutionary within-species dynamics shape macroevolutionary phenomena.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBody SizeBrainAnimalsOrgan SizePhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID41345092
PMCPMC12775500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.