ArticleNature communications2025
Hologenomic analysis of rectal mucus sampling for detection of adenomatous polyps and colorectal cancer.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanism-Driven Diagnostic Development: A Specimen-Aware Framework Illustrated by Colorectal Cancer and Solid Tumours.Cancers · 2026Review
- EHItk: a toolkit for accessing Earth Hologenome Initiative data resources.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Navigating the molecular landscape: integrated multiomics liquid biopsy for biomarker discovery in early detection and monitoring of colorectal cancer.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with incidence rising among younger populations. The significant clinical and economic burden highlights the need for minimally invasive technologies capable of detecting pre-malignant and early-stage disease. Although liquid biopsy approaches have advanced, they have not achieved sufficient performance for clinical adoption when compared with colonoscopy, the current diagnostic gold standard. CRC is a mucosal pathology, yet current diagnostic methods have not leveraged mucosal biology. Here we demonstrate the clinical utility of rectal mucus specimens, collected using a minimally invasive device in an outpatient setting, without bowel preparation. Through a hologenomic approach integrating host and microbial genomics, we identify genetic and epigenetic aberrations and perturbations in microbial communities that drive the detection of adenomatous polyps and CRC in rectal mucus. Hologenomic integration enables superior stratification of CRC by disease site and stage compared with single-omics methods. In summary, we demonstrate the clinical utility of rectal mucus sampling combined with hologenomic analysis as a translatable prospective tool for diagnostic application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.