Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41344945›Full record

ReviewIndian pacing and electrophysiology journal

Developmental, normal, and abnormal anatomy of the coronary sinus.

Robert H Anderson, Diane E Spicer, Damian Sanchez-Quintana

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robert H AndersonBiosciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom. Electronic address: sejjran@ucl.ac.uk.
Diane E SpicerHeart Institute, Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St Petersburg, FL, United States of America.
Damian Sanchez-QuintanaDepartamento de Anatomía Humana y Biología Celular, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronary sinus is the persisting remnant of the left horn of the developing systemic venous sinus. During the fifth week of human development, the channel is incorporated, with its own walls, into the left atrioventricular groove. Sprouts from the newly formed sinus then provide the basis for formation of the great, middle, and small cardiac veins. Postnatally, the sinus provides drainage of the greater part of the venous return from the heart. The left superior caval vein itself largely regresses, with only its terminal part persisting as the oblique vein of the left atrium. Union of the oblique vein and the great cardiac vein serves to mark the distal extent of the sinus, with its proximal boundary formed at its entrance to the right atrium, guarded by the Thebesian valve. The great cardiac vein itself forms the base of the left ventricular summit, with this area initially described as a triangle by Brocq and Mouchet. In the setting of congenital persistence of the left superior caval vein, the sinus, and its right atrial orifice, are usually dilated. An imperforate Thebesian valve produces atresia of the sinus, with the persisting left superior caval vein then providing a conduit for retrograde passage of cardiac venous return to the right atrium. Rarer malformations are so-called "unroofing" of the sinus, and aneurysmal dilation to form diverticulums in the inferior wall of the ventricular mass. The sinus can also be abnormal, or absent, in the setting of isomerism.

Indexed as

Great cardiac veinLeft atrioventricular junctionLeft sinus hornLeft superior caval veinLeft ventricular summitVein of Marshall

Identifiers

PMID41344945
PMCPMC12861964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.