ArticleBMJ open2025
Student paramedic experiences of group-based simulation activities used in assessment: a qualitative UK study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis research aimed to explore student paramedics' experiences of participating in group-based simulation activities used as part of their summative assessment. It sought to understand their perceptions of the effectiveness of group-based simulation in fostering learning and informing future assessment design.
designA qualitative questionnaire-based study.
settingA UK higher education institution.
participantsA total of 34 first-year (level 4) student paramedics from the September 2022 to September 2023 cohorts.
interventionFollowing the completion of a summative assessment for the introduction to non-technical skills and simulation module, students were invited to reflect on their experiences of group-based simulation through an online questionnaire. The assessment incorporated team-based simulation scenarios intended to evaluate non-technical competencies within a realistic and supportive environment.
resultsFour key themes emerged through thematic analysis of the responses: experiential learning; autonomous learning; reflective learning; and support and learning. These themes provide insights into the pedagogical value of group-based simulation, with students identifying both individual and collective benefits in developing non-technical skills within a group assessment framework.
conclusionGroup-based simulation assessments enhance student engagement and promote collaborative decision-making in a context that mimics real paramedic practice. While students often associate realism with increased confidence, their experiences highlight complex interactions between perceived fidelity, assessment pressure and learning. This underscores the need to further investigate how group dynamics and authenticity influence learning outcomes in assessment-focused simulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.