Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41344717›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Quality and safety management of advanced medical technologies in home care organisations in the Netherlands: a qualitative survey at the tactical level.

Ingrid Ten Haken, Somaya Ben Allouch, Wim H van Harten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ingrid Ten HakenSchool of Health, Research Group Technology, Health & Care, Saxion University of Applied Sciences, Enschede, The Netherlands i.tenhaken@saxion.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7480-9414
Somaya Ben AllouchResearch Group Digital Life, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wim H van HartenFaculty Behavioural, Management & Social Sciences, Department of Health Technology & Services Research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA quality management system (QMS) in healthcare organisations encompasses not only policies, processes and necessary procedures but also the quality, safety and risk management of medical technology. Tactical and operational decision-making levels should be closely interconnected. Previous studies have shown that nurses at the operational level do have good awareness of patient safety, but especially in teams with a strong degree of self-organisation, interaction with tactical levels is an issue. The tactical level is regarded as crucial for linking top-down policy with bottom-up experiences.

objectivesTo explore the perspectives of homecare employees working at a tactical level regarding (1) the quality frameworks used within their organisation according to these employees, (2) the extent to which these employees are aware of the procedures for the safe use of advanced medical technologies (AMTs), such as infusion pumps, within their organisation and (3) how these employees perceive the patient safety culture related to the use of AMTs within their organisation.

designA qualitative descriptive research design was employed. SETTING AND

participants15 semistructured interviews were conducted online with purposively sampled participants from homecare organisations across the Netherlands that had previously participated in related studies. The participants were employees at the tactical level within these homecare organisations, responsible for the quality and safety of AMTs.

resultsAll participating organisations possess a QMS; however, only seven indicated that there is a dedicated plan for ensuring the quality and safety of AMTs. National protocols for the use of AMTs and the supplier's maintenance protocols are commonly followed. Although some participants say that their organisation has no formal procedure for resolving malfunctions with AMTs, all participants know pathways for solving problems. Tailored training programmes for nurses on AMTs are provided, but often without testing knowledge and skills or formal registration of nurses' competence. Professionals report an incident on a separate form in the electronic client file or via a separate reporting system. However, there is no uniformity within organisations about handling incidents. Most interviewees state that, in any case, incidents are discussed within the team. On the dimension 'reporting, evaluating and learning from incidents' of the 'Instrument for Self-Evaluation of Patient Safety Culture', the prevailing patient safety culture is, on average, characterised as 'proactive'.

conclusionsThere is a lack of uniformity regarding quality and safety procedures for the use of AMTs in homecare organisations, and structured policies for the implementation, use and maintenance of AMTs are needed. This study identified additional risk factors regarding individual competencies in the use of AMTs at home. Employees at the tactical level seem to be more positive about the patient safety culture with AMTs in their organisations than nurses at the operational level are.

Indexed as

Biomedical TechnologyHome Care ServicesPatient SafetySafety ManagementAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleNetherlandsOrganizational CultureQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesNursing CareQUALITATIVE RESEARCHQuality ImprovementRisk managementSafety

Identifiers

PMID41344717
PMCPMC12684138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.