Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41344705›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

HERNIIA-II trial (Hernia Endoscopic oR opeN repair In chIldren Analysis): a protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial to study the (cost-)effectiveness of laparoscopic hernia repair compared to open hernia repair in children 0-16 years.

Sanne C Maat, Lore Elise de Vreeze, Roxanne Eurlings, Johannes Anema, Robertine Van Baren, Jasper V Been, Frank van den Broek, Hamit Cakir, Johanna M van Dongen, Floris Ferenschild and 12 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06451432 ('Hernia Endoscopic oR opeN Repair In chIldren Analysis"), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06451432 narecruitingnot on this map

'Hernia Endoscopic oR opeN Repair In chIldren Analysis": A Randomized Controlled Trial to Study the (Cost-) Effectiveness of Paediatric Laparoscopic Hernia Repair Compared to Open Hernia Repair

TypeinterventionalSponsorAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)Ran2024 to 2028Enrolled464ConditionsInguinal HerniaArmsPercutaneous Inguinal Ring Suturing (PIRS) technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Sanne C MaatPaediatric Surgery, Emma Kinderziekenhuis Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5957-7056
Lore Elise de VreezePaediatric Surgery, Emma Kinderziekenhuis Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1466-9631
Roxanne EurlingsDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, MosaKids Children's Hospital, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Johannes AnemaPublic and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Robertine Van BarenDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen Beatrix Childrens Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Jasper V BeenDepartment of Paediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank van den BroekDepartment of Surgery, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Hamit CakirDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, MosaKids Children's Hospital, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Johanna M van DongenDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Floris FerenschildDepartment of Paediatric Surgery, Amalia Children's hospital, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jurgen C de GraaffDepartment of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2168-7900
Robert NijveldtDepartment of Surgery, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Anne OttenhofDepartment of Surgery, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, The Netherlands.
Arianne J PloegSurgery, Alrijne Zorggroep, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands.
Hester RippenKind en Ziekenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jetske RuiterkampDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jos W R TwiskDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Erik VermeulenDepartment of Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands.
Ralph De WitDepartment of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Gerda ZijpPaediatric Surgery, Haga Hospital Juliana Childrens Hospital, Den Haag, The Netherlands.
Ernest L W van HeurnDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joep P M DerikxUniversiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands j.derikx@amsterdamumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInguinal hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed operations in the paediatric population and can be performed according to two approaches: open or laparoscopic. At present, decisive evidence about the best treatment strategy is lacking and consequently, there is an ongoing debate about the most (cost-)effective treatment for the paediatric inguinal hernia. The aim of the Hernia Endoscopic oR opeN repair In chIldren Analysis-trial (HERNIIA2-trial) is to estimate the (cost-)effectiveness of the laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing (PIRS) technique compared with open repair in children aged 0-16 years with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A national multicentre randomised controlled trial will be performed including 464 children aged 0-16 years with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Patients will be randomised between the open or PIRS technique. The primary outcome is the number of reoperations within 2 years after primary surgery. Secondary outcome measures are: operative and postoperative complications, total duration of surgery, postoperative pain, length of admission, time to normal daily activities, cosmetic appearance of the scar, social and healthcare costs and health-related quality of life. Furthermore, cost-effectiveness will be assessed from a societal and healthcare perspective. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Hospital. Informed consent will be obtained by parents and, if possible, according to age, by patient. The study will be conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (2013) and in accordance with the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO) and Good Clinical Practice. Study findings will be disseminated through scientific publications, conferences and patient-friendly materials. The national study network of participating centres will facilitate rapid dissemination and implementation within the Netherlands and potentially abroad. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov PRS (ID NCT06451432).

Indexed as

Hernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyLaparoscopyAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicNetherlandsPostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicPAEDIATRICSPAEDIATRIC SURGERYRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID41344705
PMCPMC12684125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.