ArticleBMJ open2025
Screen time and sleep problems in South Indian preschoolers: a community-based cross-sectional study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo estimate the prevalence of sleep problems among children aged 2-5 years residing in South India, assess its association with screen time and identify a predictive screen time threshold.
designPopulation-based cross-sectional study.
settingField practice areas in rural and urban centres of a medical college in South India.
participantsIn total, 523 children aged 2-5 years were selected by simple random sampling. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Sleep problems were assessed using the validated bedtime problems, excessive daytime sleepiness, awakenings during the night, regularity of sleep and snoring sleep screening tool. Sociodemographic and behavioural factors, including screen time, were also examined. The optimal predictive screen time cut-off was identified using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
resultsSleep disturbances were reported in 39.6% of children (95% CI 35.5% to 43.8%). The most common sleep problems were irregular sleep (22.2%), bedtime resistance (20.8%) and night awakening (19.9%). Multivariate logistic regression showed strong associations between sleep problems and screen use in bed (adjusted OR (AOR) = 3.8; 95% CI 2.4 to 6.1), excess screen time (AOR=3.3; 95% CI 1.8 to 6), smaller family size (AOR=3.1; 95% CI 1.5 to 6.1), reduced physical activity (AOR=2.6; 95% CI 1.6 to 4.2), shorter birth spacing (AOR=1.8; 95% CI 1.1 to 2.8), lower socioeconomic status (AOR=1.8; 95% CI 1.2 to 2.8) and maternal screen time>2 hours/day (AOR=1.6; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.6). ROC analysis identified ≥2.4 hours per day of screen time as the optimal threshold for predicting sleep problems (area under the curve=0.800; sensitivity, 73.9% and specificity, 77.2%).
conclusionIn this large population-based study, two of the five preschool children experienced sleep problems, with excess screen time, particularly screen use in bed, being the key contributing factor. This is one of the few Indian studies to establish an ROC-derived screen time threshold for identifying sleep problems. These findings can guide targeted parental advice and early preventive strategies to promote healthy sleep in preschool children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.