Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41344659›Full record

ArticleMilitary medicine2026

Fighting to Train-Implementation of a Train Like You Fight Joint Role 2 Austere Surgical Care Curriculum.

Matthew D Tadlock, Dan S Mosely, Jay B Baker, Sean Keenan, Ronald David Hardin, Tyson Erik Becker, Richard A Jarret, Jennifer M Gurney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Military medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matthew D TadlockDepartment of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, CA 92134, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5563-1710
Dan S MoselyJoint Trauma System, DoD Center of Excellence for Trauma, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam, Houston, TX 78234, United States.
Jay B BakerJoint Trauma System, DoD Center of Excellence for Trauma, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam, Houston, TX 78234, United States.
Sean KeenanJoint Trauma System, DoD Center of Excellence for Trauma, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam, Houston, TX 78234, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3602-6926
Ronald David HardinCommittee on Surgical Combat Casualty Care, Joint Trauma System, Joint Base San Antonia-For Sam, Houston, TX 78234, United States.
Tyson Erik BeckerBrooke Army Medical Center, JBSA, 3551 Roger Brooke Dr, San Antonio, TX 78234, United States.
Richard A JarretJoint Trauma System, DoD Center of Excellence for Trauma, Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam, Houston, TX 78234, United States.
Jennifer M GurneyCommittee on Surgical Combat Casualty Care, Joint Trauma System, Joint Base San Antonia-For Sam, Houston, TX 78234, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0451-1137

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEach military service has independently developed austere resuscitative and surgical care (ARSC) team training courses that vary in use, content, duration, tactical exposure, and clinical emphasis. A 2020 Department of Defense Inspector General audit identified training deficits for ARSC teams. To close this gap, we developed ARSC curriculum standards for the Joint Force. MATERIALS AND

methodsA work group of Tri-Service appointed multidisciplinary subject matter experts (SMEs) reviewed available Role 2 and ARSC training courses to identify common curricular elements, best practices, and training gaps. Through an iterative process, these findings were incorporated into a standard curriculum organized into modules subdivided into terminal learning objectives (TLOs) and enabling learning objectives (ELOs), which were validated against Service doctrinal ARSC capability requirements.

resultsCurricula from 12 different courses were identified and reviewed. Most prepared teams for Counter Insurgency operations characterized by short holding times and rapid aeromedical evacuation. Eighty-two clinical and nonclinical common curricular best practices were identified. Only four courses had 50% or more of SME-recommended curricular elements. Identified curricular gaps included prolonged holding (0% of courses), definitive austere surgical care (0%), austere critical care (25%), simulated tactical exposure (25%), night operations familiarization (37.5%), and simulated operational environment (62.5%). Ten modules were created comprised of 20 TLOs and 259 ELOs incorporating curricular best practices and identified gaps.

conclusionMilitary medicine is preparing surgical teams for the war just fought, not the future fight and lacks a joint standard for training Role 2/ARSC surgical teams, which is a risk to force and to mission. We close this gap by creating the first Joint Role 2 forward surgical/ARSC curriculum.

Indexed as

CurriculumMilitary MedicineMilitary PersonnelResuscitationHumans

Identifiers

PMID41344659
PMCPMC13331495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.