ReviewIndian pacing and electrophysiology journal
The MAZE procedure in atrial fibrillation: An evolution of rhythm surgery.
Review in Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Atrial fibrillation and heart failure.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Cox-Maze procedure is the cornerstone of surgical rhythm-control therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF). Developed to interrupt macro-reentrant conduction while preserving physiological atrial activation. It has evolved from the original cut-and-sew Maze I-III Operations, based on earlier strategies like a corridor surgery to today's energy-based Cox-Maze IV (CM-IV) and minimal invasive operations. Contemporary surgical ablation can be performed concomitantly with valve or coronary surgery, as a stand-alone operation, or via minimally invasive or hybrid strategies integrating electrophysiologic mapping. Numerous works is done by Cox, providing the understanding, development and acceptance for this surgery. Later, early work was done by Ad and Damiano. The minimal invasive approach, originally developed by Wolff and later performed through VATS by van Boven was based on combining the work of Cox, with the landmark paper of Haissageurre in 1998, showing that the origin of AF is mostly situated in the PVI's. This was further developed in a Hybrid approach. Providing evidence, in diverse ways, from the groups of Maastricht and Amsterdam. In concomitant operation, performing a Maze or a PVI beside another cardiac operation, current evidence shows durable sinus-rhythm restoration and survival benefit without added operative risk. Future directions center on advanced imaging, patient tailored lesion design and new energy sources like non-thermal pulsed-field ablation (PFA) next to combining surgical and catheter-based therapies in hybrid operating rooms. This review traces the evolution, evidence, technical refinements, and forward trajectory of Maze surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.