ReviewJournal of the National Cancer Institute2026
Cisplatin during radiation for head and neck cancer: insights from NRG Oncology experience.
Review in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Facile synthesis of platinated DNA nanoparticles with radiosensitizing potential.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCisplatin remains the cornerstone radiosensitizer for definitive and adjuvant chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. However, despite decades of clinical use, many practical aspects of cisplatin administration remain unstandardized in clinical practice and trials.
methodsDrawing on the collective experience of the NRG Oncology Head and Neck Working Group, this consensus article provides practical guidance on the administration of cisplatin during radiation therapy. We review and propose recommendations regarding the timing of chemotherapy and radiation initiation, premedication and hydration regimens by dose, monitoring and grading of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity, and management strategies during cisplatin shortages. Our guidance is informed by clinical trial protocols, retrospective and prospective data, and multidisciplinary expert consensus. We emphasize the importance of protocol flexibility to support equitable trial accrual, minimize treatment delays, and improve patient-centered outcomes.
conclusionsThis article offers a unified framework to optimize the use of cisplatin in chemoradiation protocols, improve adherence, reduce toxicity, and preserve oncologic efficacy. Our recommendations are particularly timely in the context of evolving clinical practices and recent cisplatin shortages. Insights from the NRG Oncology collaborative group aim to inform future trial designs and clinical practice guidelines, ensuring consistent and equitable care for patients with head and neck cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.