ArticleJournal of hazardous materials2026
Non-destructive surface sampling of PFAS exposure on firefighter protective gears: Potential implications for occupational exposure.
Article in Journal of hazardous materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Exposure Profiles and Their Predictors in a Study of US Volunteer Firefighters.American journal of industrial medicine · 2026Article
- Associations of cognitive function with recent and cumulative per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances exposure in firefighters.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026Article
- Serum PFAS in Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) Firefighters From Six U.S. Airport Fire Departments.American journal of industrial medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of anthropogenic pollutants that pose significant global environmental and health challenges. While PFAS exposure occurs through various pathways, occupational exposure among firefighters is particularly concerning. This study introduces a non-invasive, and non-destructive sample collection protocol using textile wipes to assess PFAS on firefighter safety gear and potential health issues. Dampened polypropylene fabrics were used to swab 12 firefighter turnout gear sets, including jacket shoulders, pant shins, inside and outside of SCBA masks, then extracted with methanol and analyzed for 30 different PFAS using LC-MS/MS. The mean sum of PFAS concentrations (∑PFAS) on firefighter turnout gear was 62.4 ng/g (8.3-332 ng/g), whereas 6:2 FTS was the predominant PFAS with a mean concentration of 38 ng/g (0.16-284 ng/g). Inside SCBA masks, the mean ∑PFAS was 26 ng/g, while 6:2 FTS was found at 15 ng/g. Other major PFAS observed in turnout gears were PFOA, PFHxA, PFBA, and PFPeA, which reflects the chemical composition of the foam firefighters are exposed to. A significant difference in PFAS exposure profiles was observed between body regions and SCBA masks. A Physiologically Based ToxicoKinetic (PBTK) model was applied to estimate plasma levels of PFAS, revealing concentrations indicative of potential occupational risk among firefighters and warranting further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.