Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Xiangkun XuBiomedical Imaging and Radiation Technology Laboratory (BIRTLab), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4831-8539
Yu-Pei TsengBiomedical Imaging and Radiation Technology Laboratory (BIRTLab), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8202-0619
Hamid DeghhaniSchool of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom.
Luke HardyDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Zhishen TongBiomedical Imaging and Radiation Technology Laboratory (BIRTLab), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Gao GuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America.
Amyn HabibDepartment of Neurology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
Iulian IordachitaLaboratory for Computational Sensing and Robotics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
John W WongDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Ken Kang-Hsin WangBiomedical Imaging and Radiation Technology Laboratory (BIRTLab), Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8561-2898
Funding
X-ray/optical tomographic guidance and assessment for pre-clinical radiation ResearchR37CA230341 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI WANG, KEN KANG-HSIN · 2019 to 2025
$2.2M
Quantitative bioluminescence tomography for pre-clinical radiotherapy researchR01CA240811 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI WANG, KEN KANG-HSIN · 2019 to 2023
$1.3M
A pre-clinical x-ray/optical tomography-guided radiation research platform for pancreatic cancerR21CA223403 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI WANG, KEN KANG-HSIN · 2018 to 2019
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
High precision fluorescence tomography system for pre-clinical radiation research: system design and validation. · full record | OpenQuestion