Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41343969›Full record

ArticleNursing ethics2026

Nursing possessed: An ethics of nurse haunting.

Danisha Jenkins, Jess Dillard-Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Danisha JenkinsSan Diego State University School of Nursing, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6365-152X
Jess Dillard-WrightUmass Amherst College of Nursing, Amherst, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper explores how contemporary US healthcare, shaped by neoliberal biopolitics and thanatopolitics, functions as a death-making institution that commodifies care while systematically disposing of certain lives, reflecting an ethics not of care but of capital. Drawing from critical theory, historical analysis, and lived experience, we examine how death is deeply embedded in the structures of power and capitalism. Through the lens of haunting and organized forgetting, we analyze how institutions sanitize death, muting human loss into metrics and decontextualized data points, while erasing the tragedies of systemic violence. We argue that nurses, who are situated in physical and spiritual proximity to death, are uniquely positioned to act as witnesses, truth-tellers, and conjurers of the dead. Rather than comply with the institutional imperative to forget, we advocate for a practice of conjuring; calling forth the ghosts of those lost to violence of medical neglect, structural racism, and economic abandonment as a form of parrhesia: dangerous, necessary truth-telling. We explore how organized forgetting rewrites radical histories into palatable myths, disciplining contemporary activism and muting its transformative potential. We turn to examples like the Marys of ACT UP, whose embodied activism illustrates the power of public grief and haunting to incite justice. Inspired by theorists such as Foucault, Giroux, Derrida, and Ahmed, we locate in mourning a form of resistance, in memory a political act, and in storytelling a path to rehumanization. Ultimately, we argue that to conjure our dead is not only to remember them but to be transformed by them, allowing their voices to shape our ethical responsibilities, professional identities, and collective futures. In being possessed by our dead, we foreclose upon the institutional disavowal of suffering and reclaim a politics rooted in compassionate reckoning and the belief that another world is possible.

Indexed as

Ethics, NursingDeathGriefHumansUnited Statesbiopoliticscomforthauntingparrhesiathanatopolitics

Identifiers

PMID41343969
PMCPMC13103342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.