ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2026
Promises past and future - Gene therapy and the actualisation of future expectations.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial: Innovative therapeutic approaches for complex cancers: exploring new strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The advent of gene therapies such as Zolgensma, Libmeldy, and Luxturna has given rise to new treatment options for several rare conditions, drastically changing the expectations of affected patients. It has also significantly influenced hopes of medical treatment in general, with an emerging vision of widespread targeted personalised treatment of increasingly segmented conditions. Looking at a newspaper sample from the latest wave of developments in the field (from January 01, 2020 until April 30, 2023), our analysis of current media coverage however finds that this narrative of paradigmatic change operates mostly without regard to the present and its challenges, such as the prohibitive price tag of these treatments and unresolved questions about their accessibility and long-term effects. Drawing on expectations raised in the context of the completion of the Human Genome Project in 2000, the article compares these to current hopes of gene therapy's safety and effectiveness; profitability; and accessibility. Areas of tension are then interpreted as a guide to an emerging 'real-life' understanding of gene therapy's promise, which is, however, mostly visible in discussions of problems with gene therapy's accessibility. Similarly marginalised issues include for instance assumptions of effectiveness that do not acknowledge the long-term uncertainty of treatment outcomes; and assumptions of profitability that run counter to real-life examples of business failure. As a revolutionary future becomes reality for some patients, such questions are becoming harder to ignore - but are crucially often omitted from discussion about projected change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.