Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41343853›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2025

Needs and Expectations for the myNewWay Blended Digital and Face-to-Face Psychotherapy Model of Care for Depression and Anxiety (Part 2): Participatory Design Study including Mental Health Professionals.

Rosemaree Kathleen Miller, Kathleen O'Moore, Katarina Kikas, Julie-Anne Therese Matheson, Alexis Estelle Whitton, Peter Baldwin, Sophie Li, Melissa Black, Laura Kampel, Nicole Cockayne and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Rosemaree Kathleen Miller *Black Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1718-7062
Kathleen O'Moore *Black Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5211-9095
Katarina KikasBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1416-4631
Julie-Anne Therese MathesonBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4121-6794
Alexis Estelle WhittonBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7944-2172
Peter BaldwinBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3319-6252
Sophie LiBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4762-6911
Melissa BlackBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1450-1140
Laura KampelBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7107-6529
Nicole CockayneBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0155-1202
Fiona TuttlebeeBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0009-0004-7550-1202
Caitlin FraserBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0009-0003-1068-2332
Victoria CarrBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0586-1451
Kathleen VargheseBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Jill Maree NewbyBlack Dog Institute, Randwick, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6473-9811

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In blended care, digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) integrate with face-to-face psychotherapy provided in person or via telehealth. To incorporate DMHIs into routine care for depression and anxiety, it is important to understand the needs and expectations of mental health professionals for blended DMHIs. Objective: The study objective was to partner with Australian mental health professionals in the design of a transdiagnostic, cognitive behavioral therapy-based blended model of care for adults experiencing depression and anxiety. Methods: Participants were Australian health professionals who treat adults with depression and anxiety. The participatory design process included a web-based survey (N=258), one-on-one interviews (N=14), and a 2-part focus group (N=6). Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through the web-based survey. In-depth qualitative feedback from interviews and the 2-part focus group was subjected to reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Mental health professionals found blended care with face-to-face therapy more acceptable than telehealth and blended care with telehealth, with standalone DMHIs being the least preferred option. The most common ways in which mental health professionals thought a DMHI could integrate with face-to-face psychotherapy included homework completion (129/178, 72.5%), skills practice to support in-session therapy (128/178, 71.9%), and psychoeducation (127/178, 71.3%). Mental health professionals expect the blended DMHI to be easy to use, flexible, protective of client data, and to include evidence-based content from several therapeutic modalities (eg, cognitive behavioral therapy and mindfulness). Other preferences included mental health professionals being able to prescribe specific program modules to their clients, track the treatment progress of clients, and receive alerts if their clients' symptoms worsened. In terms of implementation, mental health professionals were concerned about the time and effort needed to use blended care. They suggested that ongoing training and support would help mental health professionals implement blended care with their clients. Monitoring client risk and progress via a web-based dashboard and downloadable summaries was also important. Conclusions: Designing DMHIs that support psychotherapy for adults with depression and anxiety has the potential to increase access to evidence-based treatment. Involving mental health professionals in DMHI design is expected to increase their acceptance of DMHIs and facilitate the integration of these digital products into routine care.

Indexed as

AnxietyCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionHealth PersonnelPsychotherapyAdultAustraliaFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchTelemedicineanxietyblended caredepressiondigital interventionparticipatory designsmartphone

Identifiers

PMID41343853
PMCPMC12677875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.