Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41343843›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Enhancing Access to Family Planning Services in Uganda Through Community Health Extension Workers: Protocol for a Pilot Evaluation.

Lydia Kabwijamu, Steven Ndugwa Kabwama, Fredrick Makumbi, Roselline Achola, Andrew Tusubira, Sarah Nabukeera, Christine K Nalwadda

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lydia Kabwijamu *Department of Community Health & Behavioral Sciences, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-1542-7950
Steven Ndugwa Kabwama *Department of Community Health & Behavioral Sciences, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-0354-9571
Fredrick MakumbiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-6460-7325
Roselline AcholaDepartment of Community Health & Behavioral Sciences, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-3169-4389
Andrew TusubiraDepartment of Community Health & Behavioral Sciences, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0003-0435-3666
Sarah NabukeeraDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-9172-5642
Christine K NalwaddaDepartment of Community Health & Behavioral Sciences, Makerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-9145-4854

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In Uganda, 22% of all women of reproductive age have an unmet need for family planning services. Access to contraceptive services, especially long-term reversible contraceptives such as implants, remains a challenge. The number of trained health providers is also not sufficient to address the needs for contraception. The Uganda Ministry of Health implemented a community-based implant provision pilot project where community health extension workers (CHEWs) were trained and accredited to insert implants at community level. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the implementation and acceptability of stakeholders toward task shifting the provision of family planning implants to CHEWs in Uganda. Methods: The evaluation will use a cross-sectional design using both quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative component will use a noninferiority design, whereas the qualitative component will use a descriptive approach. The noninferiority design involves a comparison of the competence of the currently authorized cadre to offer the service to the proposed cadre (CHEWs). Compared with a randomized controlled trial, the noninferiority design is more appropriate for this evaluation because the CHEWs and the authorized cadre are not comparable in terms of level of training and competencies. The authorized cadre has gone through formal training, which is not comparable with the training the CHEWs have received, and so the comparison is such that the competencies of the CHEWs are noninferior or at most equal to the competencies of the authorized cadre. Quantitative data will be collected among 92 CHEWs and 92 qualified health workers using performance assessment checklists and practice-based questionnaires that were developed based on the training manuals. Competency will be measured on a continuous scale and summarized as mean (SD) scores. Qualitative data will be collected through key informant interviews (n=23), in-depth interviews (n=24), and focus group discussions (n=18). Qualitative data will be analyzed using thematic analysis following the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data using ATLAS.ti (version 9). Results: Preliminary findings indicate improved confidence and capacity of community health workers to provide implants despite challenges such as poor waste disposal, record keeping, and data management. By August 2025, training of research assistants had been concluded, and data collection had started. We anticipate that the data collection will be completed by the end of October 2025, the data analysis will be completed by November 2025, and the final results will be published by December 2026. Conclusions: This pilot will generate contextual information that can be used to improve access to family planning services at the community level.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersFamily Planning ServicesHealth Services AccessibilityIntrauterine DevicesProfessional CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicPilot ProjectsQualitative ResearchUgandacommunity health workerscontraceptivesevaluationfamily planningprotocolreproductive healthUganda

Identifiers

PMID41343843
PMCPMC12677868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.