Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41343813›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Development of a Cocreated Perioperative Joint Replacement Digital Care Pathway to Improve Surgical Outcomes Following Joint Replacement: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

Adam I Semciw, Rebecca Jessup, Rachel Duckham, Swapna Gokhale, Hayley Gray, Emily C Bell, Stephen M Quick, Juliette Gentle, Uyen Phan, Katharine See and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Adam I SemciwLa Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5399-7463
Rebecca JessupLa Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2211-5231
Rachel DuckhamLa Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7882-2950
Swapna GokhaleLa Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0705-834X
Hayley GrayNorthern Health, Epping, Australia.ORCID 0009-0008-9966-9447
Emily C BellLa Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6425-7003
Stephen M QuickLa Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4138-4533
Juliette GentleNorthern Health, Epping, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1932-5150
Uyen PhanNorthern Health, Epping, Australia.ORCID 0009-0001-9142-740X
Katharine SeeNorthern Health, Epping, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9195-7892
Rebecca Galea-O'NeillNorthern Health, Epping, Australia.ORCID 0009-0002-4618-5963
James BoydLa Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8925-8811
Hazel HengLa Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8662-7063
Tracey WebsterNorthern Health, Epping, Australia.ORCID 0009-0001-0368-6699
Matthew G KingLa Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0470-5924

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, perioperative care has gained attention for its ability to improve outcomes, reduce costs, and enhance patient satisfaction, especially when multidisciplinary support is involved. Despite these benefits, patient compliance remains low due to limited engagement in program design and practical barriers such as transportation, particularly for older adults. Co-designed digital health solutions offer a promising, scalable approach to delivering personalized, accessible perioperative care, with emerging evidence supporting their feasibility and effectiveness in patients who undergo joint replacement.

objectiveThe objectives of this study protocol are to outline the methods to address three study aims: (1) understand gaps and unmet needs, including knowledge, perceptions, barriers, and acceptability, during the perioperative patient journey of hip and knee arthroplasty; (2) co-create a novel patient-centric digital care pathway (DCP) that provides education and systematically captures patient-reported outcomes; and (3) evaluate the feasibility of implementation, appropriateness, and acceptability of the pathway when tested in patients undergoing nontraumatic hip and knee joint arthroplasty.

methodsThis mixed methods co-design and implementation study will be conducted across 3 phases informed by the generative co-design framework for health care interventions. In phase 1 (predesign), patient interviews and journey mapping will be used to identify perioperative care gaps to be addressed in the DCP. In phase 2 (co-design), care gaps will be collaboratively framed, and iterative prototyping of the DCP will be conducted with consumer feedback and pilot testing. In phase 3 (evaluation), the feasibility of the DCP will be assessed using a previously reported framework. Inclusion criteria will vary across phases, focusing on people with lived experience or undergoing hip or knee joint replacement and relevant clinical or administrative staff.

resultsThe study was funded in September 2024, with phase 1 commencing in July 2025 and phase 2 in October 2025. Phase 3 is projected to commence before the end of 2025 and conclude 6 months later. As of October 2025, 13 people had been recruited, interviews were completed for phase 1, and recruitment for phase 2 had commenced.

conclusionsThis protocol enhances methodological transparency by detailing the co-design approach, strengthening the evidence base, and supporting the development of a credible, transferable DCP. It addresses the lack of patient-centric perioperative programs in joint replacement care by incorporating individual needs and preferences. The digital format helps overcome access barriers, such as transport limitations, enabling patients to engage with the pathway anywhere. Additionally, patient-reported outcome measures collected through the DCP will improve understanding of recovery trajectories following hip and knee replacements. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/85701.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneePerioperative CareHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient Satisfactionarthroplastyco-designdigital healthpatient educationrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID41343813
PMCPMC12715470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.