Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41343780›Full record

Observational studyJMIR medical informatics2025

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of In-Hospital Falls in Adult Inpatients: Retrospective Observational Multicenter Study.

Takuya Nishino, Kotone Matsuyama, Yasuo Miyagi, Nari Tanabe, Fumiko Yamaguchi, Hiroki Ito, Shizuka Soh, Ayako Yano, Masako Mizuno, Katsuhito Kato and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Takuya NishinoDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0004-5898-5241
Kotone MatsuyamaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4390-0984
Yasuo MiyagiDepartment of Medical Safety Control, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2627-5040
Nari TanabeFaculty of Engineering, Suwa University of Science, Nagano, Japan.ORCID 0009-0009-7508-3107
Fumiko YamaguchiDepartment of Medical Safety Control, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0001-2944-3396
Hiroki ItoDepartment of Medical Safety Control, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0008-1839-4008
Shizuka SohDepartment of Medical Safety Control, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0001-8622-1992
Ayako YanoDepartment of Medical Safety Control, Nippon Medical School, Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0009-0000-6086-8619
Masako MizunoNursing Department, Nippon Medical School, Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0009-0006-3060-0535
Katsuhito KatoDepartment of Hygiene and Public Health, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6796-2464
Hiroshige JinnouchiDepartment of Hygiene and Public Health, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7677-7017
Chol KimDepartment of Medical Safety Control, Nippon Medical School, Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1577-328X
Yosuke IshiiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1506-0394
Hiroki YamaguchiDepartment of Medical Safety Control, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0571-7495
Yukihiro KondoDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4141-9230

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFalls among hospitalized patients are a critical issue that often leads to prolonged hospital stays and increased health care costs. Traditional fall risk assessments typically rely on standardized scoring systems; however, these may fail to capture the complex and multifactorial nature of fall risk factors.

objectiveThis retrospective observational multicenter study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning-based model to predict in-hospital falls and to evaluate its performance in terms of discrimination and calibration.

methodsWe analyzed the data of 83,917 inpatients aged 65 years and older with a hospital stay of at least 3 days. Using Diagnosis Procedure Combination data and laboratory results, we extracted demographic, clinical, functional, and pharmacological variables. Following the selection of 30 key features, 4 predictive models were constructed: logistic regression, extreme gradient boosting, light gradient boosting machine (LGBM), and categorical boosting (CatBoost). The synthetic minority oversampling technique and isotonic regression calibration were applied to improve the prediction quality and address class imbalance.

resultsFalls occurred in 2173 (2.6%) patients. CatBoost achieved the highest F

conclusionsCatBoost and LGBM offer clinically valuable prediction performance, with CatBoost favored for high-risk patient identification and LGBM for probability-based intervention thresholds. Integrating such models into electronic health records could enable real-time risk scoring and trigger targeted interventions (eg, toileting assistance and mobility support). Future work should incorporate dynamic, time-varying patient data to improve real-time risk prediction.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsInpatientsMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk Factorscalibrationfallshospitalsinpatientsmachine learningpredictive modelrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID41343780
PMCPMC12715471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.