Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41343719›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology2026

Changes in Intraoperative Rocuronium Dosing after the Introduction of Sugammadex and Association with Postoperative Respiratory Complications: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Luca J Wachtendorf, Lars Kaiser, Elena Ahrens, Theresa Tenge, Sophia Riesemann, Xiaohan Xu, Denys Shay, Dario von Wedel, Béla-Simon Paschold, Guanqing Chen and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Luca J WachtendorfDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-9966-2092
Lars KaiserDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0009-0005-4667-9615
Elena AhrensDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-0264-5959
Theresa TengeDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9529-2461
Sophia RiesemannDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0009-0007-3523-7314
Xiaohan XuDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital and Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0243-9271
Denys ShayDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Dario von WedelDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Institute of Medical Informatics, Charite University Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8102-0254
Béla-Simon PascholdDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0009-0001-0451-3562
Guanqing ChenDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Hannah KiziltugDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Satya Krishna RamachandranDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-7176-6375
Philipp J FassbenderDepartment of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-7286-8699
Peter KienbaumDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0655-9177
Matthias EikermannDepartment of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Maximilian S SchaeferDepartment of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Center for Anesthesia Research Excellence, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8186-4748

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeuromuscular blocking agents dose-dependently precipitate residual neuromuscular blockade and postoperative respiratory complications. The introduction of sugammadex allowed for reversal of even deep neuromuscular blockade and might have provoked more liberal use of neuromuscular blocking agents. The authors investigated whether the introduction of sugammadex led to higher intraoperative rocuronium doses and whether this impacted postoperative respiratory complications.

methodsA total of 163,402 adult patient cases who underwent general anesthesia and received exclusively rocuronium at an academic medical center between 2010 and 2024 were included. Interrupted time series analysis adjusted for patient and procedural characteristics was applied to assess changes in cumulative intraoperative rocuronium doses (milligrams per kilogram body weight) after sugammadex introduction in September 2016. Rocuronium-associated risks of postoperative respiratory complications (postextubation desaturation less than 90%, 7-day reintubation or emergency noninvasive ventilation) and effect modification by use of sugammadex and qualitative (twitch count) versus quantitative (train-of-four ratio) neuromuscular monitoring were evaluated. Reported odds ratios represent the dose-response association (per 1 mg/kg rocuronium increase) within the respective subgroup of patient cases.

resultsAfter a stable baseline (-0.01 mg/kg per year between January 2010 and August 2016; 95% CI, -0.05 to 0.03 mg/kg; P = 0.58), rocuronium doses increased by 0.05 mg/kg annually after introduction of sugammadex (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.07 mg/kg; P < 0.001) from (mean ± SD) 0.83 ± 0.49 mg/kg in August 2016 to 1.20 ± 0.65 mg/kg in January 2024. A total of 9,101 of 108,317 patient cases (8.4%) experienced postoperative respiratory complications. Rocuronium was dose-dependently associated with higher postoperative respiratory complication risks, which was most pronounced among patient cases receiving neither sugammadex nor neuromuscular monitoring (adjusted odds ratio [OR adj ], 1.99 per 1 mg/kg; 95% CI, 1.82 to 2.18; P < 0.001). This association was attenuated when sugammadex was administered (n = 42,141; median dose, 200 mg; interquartile range, 200 to 300 mg; OR adj , 1.08 per 1 mg/kg; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.16; P = 0.023; P for interaction < 0.001) and abolished with quantitative (n = 25,564; OR adj , 10.94 per 1 mg/kg; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.03; P = 0.19; P for interaction < 0.001) but not qualitative neuromuscular monitoring (n = 49,045; OR adj , 1.10 per 1 mg/kg; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.18; P = 0.017; P for interaction < 0.001).

conclusionsSugammadex introduction was followed by a 45.1% increase in rocuronium doses. While sugammadex attenuated the risk of postoperative respiratory complications, it was completely abolished only with quantitative neuromuscular monitoring.

Indexed as

Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing AgentsPostoperative ComplicationsRespiration DisordersRocuroniumSugammadexAdultAgedCohort StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuromuscular BlockadeRetrospective StudiesNeuromuscular Nondepolarizing AgentsRocuroniumSugammadex

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.