Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41343590›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Brain tumour segmentation in fused MRI-PET images with permutate U-Net framework.

Yepuganti Karuna, Venu Allapakam, S Priyanka, Sk Riyaz Hussian, Peet Nalwaya, Saladi Saritha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yepuganti KarunaSchool of Electronics Engineering, VIT-AP University, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Venu AllapakamSiddarth institute of Engineering and Technology, Puttur, Tirupathi, Andhra Pradesh, India.
S PriyankaSchool of Electronics Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sk Riyaz HussianDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, RGUKT, Nuzvid, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Peet NalwayaSchool of Electronics Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Saladi SarithaSchool of Electronics Engineering, VIT-AP University, Amaravati, Andhra Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7044-6783

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain tumor segmentation from MRI's and PET has always been a challenging and time-consuming phase for radiologists, due to low sensitivity boundary region pixels in this image modality. Deep learning-based image segmentation is the hot research topic in recent days. Among all other deep learning models, U-Net-based variants are the most used models to segment medical images with respect to different modalities. In this paper, a Permutate version of the U-Net architecture was designed that precisely and automatically detects the boundaries of the tumour area and segments tumour regions from the fused image. There are two stages to the proposed work. In the first stage Principal component analysis (PCA) is used to fuse the MRI-PET images to enhance the fused image's quality and improved interpretation. Later, a Permutate U-Net architecture is employed to precisely segment tumour region from the fused image. Further designed model performance is assessed using Dice Coefficient, intersection over union score (IoU) and accuracy with brain tumour segmentation challenge BraTS datasets of 2015, 2020 and 2021. Our proposed method demonstrates promising results that are superior to existing deep learning model and comparatively higher than the existing methods.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyBrainDeep LearningHumansMultimodal ImagingPrincipal Component Analysis

Identifiers

PMID41343590
PMCPMC12677795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.