Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41343589›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2025

Variability in intrinsic promoter strength underlies the temporal hierarchy of the Caulobacter SOS response induction.

Aditya Kamat, Asha Mary Joseph, Deeksha Rathour, Anjana Badrinarayanan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aditya KamatNational Centre for Biological Sciences (TIFR), Bengaluru, India.
Asha Mary JosephNational Centre for Biological Sciences (TIFR), Bengaluru, India.
Deeksha RathourNational Centre for Biological Sciences (TIFR), Bengaluru, India.
Anjana BadrinarayananNational Centre for Biological Sciences (TIFR), Bengaluru, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5520-2134

Funding

India Alliance Intermediate
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria encode for gene regulatory networks crucial for sensing and repairing DNA damage. Upon exposure to genotoxic stress, these transcriptional networks are induced in a temporally structured manner. A case in point is of the highly conserved SOS response that is regulated by the LexA repressor. Studies have proposed that affinity of LexA towards promoters of SOS response genes is the primary determinant of its expression dynamics. Here, we describe an additional level of regulation beyond LexA box properties that modulates the SOS response gene expression pattern. Using transcriptomic analyses, we reveal a distinct temporal hierarchy in the induction of SOS-regulated genes in Caulobacter crescentus. We observe that LexA box properties are insufficient in predicting the temporal hierarchy of these genes. Instead, we find that intrinsic promoter strength underlies the order of gene activation, with differential sigma factor association as one of the factors modulating gene expression timing. Our findings highlight a novel regulatory layer in SOS dynamics and underscore the importance of promoter properties in shaping bacterial stress responses.

Indexed as

Caulobacter crescentusPromoter Regions, GeneticSOS Response, GeneticsBacterial ProteinsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, BacterialLexA Repressor ProteinSerine EndopeptidasesSigma FactorBacterial ProteinsLexA Repressor ProteinSerine EndopeptidasesSigma Factor

Identifiers

PMID41343589
PMCPMC12700426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.