Observational studyPloS one2025
Lactate-to-albumin ratio and albumin-corrected anion gap as predictors of outcome in methanol poisoning: A retrospective observational study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic Challenges of Methanol Poisoning in Resource-Limited Settings: A Case Series.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Beyond lactate: prognostic value of metabolic and biochemical parameters in methanol poisoning - a retrospective observational study.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMethanol poisoning is a serious condition with high morbidity and mortality, mainly due to its metabolism to toxic formic acid. Laboratory findings, particularly albumin-corrected anion gap (ACAG) and lactate-to-albumin ratio (LAR), can lead critical in assessing the severity of toxicity. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic significance of ACAG, lactate-to-albumin ratio and other laboratory markers in methanol poisoning and to assess the impact of admission time on patient outcome.
methodsA retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary emergency department. Patients aged ≥18 years presenting with suspected methanol poisoning between January 2020 and December 2023 were included. Diagnosis was based on the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology (AACT) treatment criteria combined with metabolic acidosis and a suggestive history. Clinical and laboratory parameters were compared between good outcome (CPC = 1) and poor outcome (CPC ≥ 2, including deaths) groups.
resultsForty-two patients were included. The mean age was 43.45 years and 95.2% were male. The mortality rate was 35.7%. Among patients with poor outcome (n = 17), 15 died and 2 survived with severe neurological sequelae. Patients with poor outcomes had significantly lower pH and bicarbonate levels and higher AG, ACAG, lactate, and creatinine levels (p < 0.001). ACAG ≥25.6 and LAR ≥ 1.24 were the strongest prognostic markers for poor prognosis. Hypotension and osmolar gap differences were noted but were evaluated only as supportive indicators of severity.
conclusionACAG and LAR can lead useful prognostic markers in methanol poisoning. Patients with ACAG ≥25.6 or LAR ≥ 1.24 should be closely monitored and considered for early intensive management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.