ArticlePloS one2025
Development and validation of the healthcare provider and family bidirectional digital communication scale.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Satisfaction With Digital Communication Among Healthcare Providers and Families in Intensive Care Units: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEffective communication between healthcare providers and families is critical in ICUs, yet existing assessment scales predominantly focus on unidirectional, face-to-face interactions. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated adoption of digital communication modalities that have persisted in contemporary practice. This study developed and validated the Healthcare Provider and Family Bidirectional Digital Communication Scale (HF-BDCS) to address these gaps. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe HF-BDCS was developed through literature review and qualitative interviews with 15 stakeholders (healthcare providers and family members). Content validity was assessed by 5 experts. Psychometric evaluation with 300 participants (100 physicians, 100 nurses, 100 family members) included exploratory factor analysis and internal consistency assessment using Cronbach's alpha.
resultsExpert review yielded 14 items with excellent content validity (S-CVI/Ave: relevance=1.00, importance=1.00, clarity=0.98). Exploratory factor analysis produced a 13-item scale with three factors explaining 64.53% of variance: Digital Communication Efficiency and Quality (6 items, 25.87%), Digital Communication Perceptions (5 items, 25.12%), and Digital Communication Regulations (2 items, 13.54%). Internal consistency was good (Cronbach's alpha=0.80-0.86) across all factors and participant subgroups. DISCUSSION: The HF-BDCS is the first validated bidirectional instrument for assessing digital communication in ICUs, demonstrating strong psychometric properties. By capturing both healthcare provider and family perspectives, the scale enables identification of perception discrepancies and supports improvements in digital communication practices, ultimately enhancing patient- and family-centered care in contemporary ICUs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.