Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41343561›Full record

ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2025

Laboratory diagnosis of melioidosis.

Ian Gassiep, Claire Chewapreecha, Narisara Chantratita, Tessa Oakley, Chiranjay Mukhopadhyay, Piyush Behari Lal, David AuCoin, Fazle Rabbi Chowdhury, Ella M Meumann, Bart J Currie and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ian GassiepFaculty of Medicine, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3548-6963
Claire ChewapreechaMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Narisara ChantratitaMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Tessa OakleyGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Dili, Timor-Leste.
Chiranjay MukhopadhyayDepartment of Microbiology and Center for Emerging and Tropical Diseases, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Piyush Behari LalDepartment of Microbiology and Center for Emerging and Tropical Diseases, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
David AuCoinDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Nevada, Reno, School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada, United States of America.
Fazle Rabbi ChowdhuryDepartment of Internal Medicine, Bangladesh Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Ella M MeumannGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.
Bart J CurrieGlobal and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.
David A B DanceLao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit, Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Laos.
Vanaporn WuthiekanunMahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Robert NortonFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 220211/Z/20/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melioidosis, caused by the Gram-negative bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei, is an infectious disease with high rates of morbidity and mortality, which primarily affects low- and middle-income countries in South and Southeast Asia and Australia. The clinical manifestations of this disease are nonspecific and, therefore, rapid laboratory diagnosis is especially critical as appropriate management requires specific antimicrobials. This article aims to provide an overview of the current diagnostic methodologies, emerging technologies, susceptibility testing, and future perspectives for laboratory diagnosis of melioidosis. By examining conventional culture methods, mass spectrometry, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, antigen detection, molecular diagnostics, and serological assays, this article highlights the current challenges in accurately and cost-effectively diagnosing melioidosis in diverse clinical and resource-limited settings. A detailed analysis of current and future diagnostic methodologies will offer valuable insights for clinicians, researchers, and public health professionals. This review aims to influence clinical and laboratory guidelines for diagnosing melioidosis and future research directions.

Indexed as

Burkholderia pseudomalleiClinical Laboratory TechniquesMelioidosisAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriological TechniquesHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID41343561
PMCPMC12677508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.