ArticlePloS one2025
How surface texture affects consumers' willingness to pay: Evidence from smartphone covers.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of tactile impressions on consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for smartphone covers with varying surface textures. While prior research has examined visual and auditory cues in consumer behavior, the commercial relevance of surface texture remains underexplored. Therefore, we analyze how WTP varies across texture types and reference price conditions and examine the demographic, socioeconomic, and behavioral factors influencing valuation. Data were collected from 387 respondents at a major shopping mall, where participants evaluated four surface textures (A-D) under two reference prices (100 yen and 1,000 yen). Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression was used to assess associations between consumer characteristics and WTP. The results show that WTP increases with higher reference prices, indicating a price anchoring effect. Men, unmarried individuals, and those exhibiting hyperbolic discounting demonstrated higher WTP for certain textures. However, risk preference, smartphone usage, and impatience were not significant predictors. These findings suggest that firms can position textured products at premium price points and employ sensory marketing strategies, such as in-store trials, to enhance consumer engagement. This study contributes to the literature by integrating tactile marketing with behavioral economic theory, offering novel insights into joint influence of sensory cues and time preferences on consumer valuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.