ArticlePloS one2025
Urban Indian healthcare referral system: A qualitative exploration from the physicians' perspectives.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Indian healthcare system continues to remain unstructured leading to sub-optimal health outcomes, not just in rural but even in urban areas. While physicians play a crucial role in shaping treatment trajectories and managing the referral process, their perspective on the referral system has received very limited academic attention in India. This study attempts to understand the archetypical physician's referral mechanism and the factors influencing their referral practices. This study also highlights the challenges and possible solutions in operationalising an efficient referral process as suggested by the professionals.
methodsIn-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with sixty-two physicians consisting of both general physicians and specialists from 19 different disciplines, associated with public and private hospitals in Bengaluru, India. The data, thus collected, was subjected to thematic analysis to generate relevant themes.
resultsFive themes emerged from the thematic analysis from a phenomenological perspective based on the physicians' lived experience. First of all, specialist physicians' availability, accessibility, experience, and reputation strongly influenced referral recommendations. It was also observed that due to lack of a comprehensive healthcare provider database, personal connections and professional networks are utilised. Moreover, although physicians prioritize patients' affordability and accessibility factors, referral counselling and caregiver-patient communication remained inadequate and required formalization. While the fourth theme clusters around several barriers related to communication, system inefficiencies, lack of awareness, accessibility and affordability among patients; the final theme suggests that the physicians emphasized on urgent need for clear guidelines, regulations and policies to streamline and monitor the referral system.
conclusionThis research highlights that physicians recognize the systemic gaps leading to unsolicited health outcomes; yet they are helpless in most cases. The participants emphasized that robust information systems connecting all relevant stakeholders are essential. The exploration reveals that the system will not adopt a structured referral method without the government taking interest in it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.