ArticlePloS one2025
Design and experimental study of a precision fluid hill-drop planter for maize.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study presents the design of a precision maize hill-drop dibbler based on fluid control and zero-speed seeding theory, developed to overcome challenges of poor planting precision, seed damage, limited terrain adaptability, and low water-use efficiency in maize cultivation across the hilly regions of Southwest China. To this end, a novel precision fluid hill-drop planter was designed, integrating fluid control with zero-speed seeding theory. The device employs a seed-liquid separation and terminal mixing design, where a crank-connecting rod-driven piston pump ensures precise fluid delivery. A direct comparative experimental framework was established, evaluating the proposed planter against a traditional spoon-wheel seeder under identical bench-test conditions. Performance was assessed through CFD-DEM coupled simulation and systematic experiments across multiple dimensions: seeding precision (qualified, multiple, and miss index), hill-forming characteristics, and fluid performance (water application per hill, seed bounce distance). The comparative results demonstrated that within an operating speed range of 1.2 ~ 1.6 m/s, the new planter achieved a qualified index exceeding 91%, a significant improvement of 12.5% over the conventional device. The seed bounce distance was controlled within 5.4 mm, representing a 63.2% reduction. Furthermore, the system exhibited excellent operational stability, with a coefficient of variation for water application per hill of less than 2% and a check valve leakage rate below 3%. Through collaborative parameter optimization, breakthrough indicators were achieved: a 94.8% seed-water coincidence rate and a hill spacing deviation of no more than 1.0%. This research validates the proposed planter's superior performance and reliability, providing an effective technical solution to enhance sowing uniformity and water-use efficiency in complex terrain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.