ArticlePloS one2025
Effect of long-term use of treated wastewater and clean water mixtures on soil heavy metal accumulation: An assessment using pollution indices.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing scarcity of clean water resources has driven increased interest in the use of treated wastewater (WW) as an alternative source for agricultural irrigation. While WW provides essential nutrients that can support plant growth and soil fertility, its long-term application may lead to the accumulation of heavy metals in soil, posing environmental and health risks. This study aimed to assess the effects of a four-year field experiment using different ratios of treated wastewater (WW) and clean water (CW) mixtures on soil heavy metal accumulation. Additionally, these effects were evaluated using widely accepted pollution indices, including the Contamination Factor (CF), Enrichment Factor (EF), Geoaccumulation Index (Igeo), and Pollution Load Index (PLI). A four-year field experiment was conducted using five irrigation regimes: W1 (100% WW), W2 (75% WW + 25% CW), W3 (50% WW + 50% CW), W4 (25% WW + 75% CW), and W5 (100% CW as control). The accumulation of Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, Fe, and Pb was monitored. Results revealed that heavy metal concentrations increased with higher WW proportions and longer irrigation duration, but all levels remained below national and international regulatory limits. CF values approached moderate contamination levels for Pb, Fe, Zn, and Cd under W1, while Cr, Ni, and Cu indicated low contamination potential. EF values were mostly below 1.0, especially under mixed irrigation schemes, suggesting minimal anthropogenic enrichment. Igeo values were negative across all treatments, with the lowest values in the control group, classifying the soils as unpolluted. PLI values were consistently below 1.0, indicating an overall unpolluted status. The findings suggest that moderate blending ratios (25-50% WW) can limit heavy metal buildup while maintaining soil productivity. Therefore, the controlled use of treated wastewater in appropriate mixtures emerges as a promising approach for sustainable agricultural irrigation, balancing productivity with environmental protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.