Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41343545›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Multi-locus phylogenetic network analysis of Ampelomyces mycoparasites isolated from diverse powdery mildews in Australia and the generation of two de novo genome assemblies.

Lauren Goldspink, Alexandros G Sotiropoulos, Alexander Idnurm, Gavin J Ash, John D W Dearnaley, Morwenna Boddington, Aftab Ahmad, Márk Z Németh, Alexandra Pintye, Markus Gorfer and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lauren GoldspinkCentre for Crop Health, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
Alexandros G SotiropoulosCentre for Crop Health, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
Alexander IdnurmSchool of BioSciences, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5995-7040
Gavin J AshCentre for Crop Health, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
John D W DearnaleyCentre for Crop Health, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
Morwenna BoddingtonCentre for Crop Health, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
Aftab AhmadCentre for Crop Health, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
Márk Z NémethPlant Protection Institute, HUN-REN Centre for Agricultural Research, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9521-8421
Alexandra PintyePlant Protection Institute, HUN-REN Centre for Agricultural Research, Budapest, Hungary.
Markus GorferAIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Bioresources, Tulln, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3010-6044
Hyeon-Dong ShinDivision of Environmental Science & Ecological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
Gábor M KovácsPlant Protection Institute, HUN-REN Centre for Agricultural Research, Budapest, Hungary.
Niloofar VaghefiSchool of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Levente KissCentre for Crop Health, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4785-4308

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interactions between powdery mildews (Ascomycota, Erysiphaceae), obligate biotrophic pathogens of many plants, and pycnidial fungi belonging to the genus Ampelomyces, are classic examples of specific mycoparasitic relationships. These interactions are common and finely tuned tritrophic relationships amongst host plants, powdery mildews, and Ampelomyces mycoparasites wherever these organisms co-occur in the field. Selected Ampelomyces strains have already been developed as biocontrol agents of powdery mildew infections of some crops. In Australia, their study has received little attention so far. Only a single Ampelomyces strain, included in a whole-genome sequencing (WGS) project, was known from this continent. Here, we report the isolation of 20 more Ampelomyces strains from eight powdery mildew species in Australia. Multi-locus phylogenetic network analyses of all the 21 Australian Ampelomyces strains carried out in combination with 32 reference strains from overseas revealed that the Australian strains belonged to four molecular taxonomic units (MOTUs). All those MOTUs were delimited earlier based on Ampelomyces strains isolated in Europe, North America, and elsewhere. Based on the phylogenetic analyses, two Australian strains belonging to different MOTUs were selected for WGS. Long-read (MinION) and short-read (Illumina) technologies were used to provide genome assemblies with high completeness. Both assemblies have a bipartite structure, i.e., consisted of AT-rich, gene-sparse regions interspersed with GC-balanced, gene-rich regions. These new high-quality assemblies and evidence-based annotations are important resources for future analyses of mycoparasitic interactions to disentangle molecular mechanisms underlying mycoparasitism, possible new biocontrol applications, and naturally occurring tritrophic relationships.

Indexed as

AscomycotaGenome, FungalPhylogenyPlant DiseasesAustraliaWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID41343545
PMCPMC12677482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.