Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41343515›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The role of active inference in conscious awareness.

Jonathan Edward Robinson, Andrew W Corcoran, Christopher J Whyte, András Sárközy, Anil K Seth, Gyula Kovács, Karl J Friston, Cyriel M A Pennartz, Giulio Tononi, Jakob Hohwy and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jonathan Edward RobinsonMonash Centre for Consciousness and Contemplative Studies, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4886-8234
Andrew W CorcoranMonash Centre for Consciousness and Contemplative Studies, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0449-4883
Christopher J WhyteMonash Centre for Consciousness and Contemplative Studies, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
András SárközyInstitute of Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0755-2077
Anil K SethSussex Centre for Consciousness Science and Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Gyula KovácsInstitute of Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2944-6607
Karl J FristonQueen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7984-8909
Cyriel M A PennartzCognitive and Systems Neuroscience, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Giulio TononiWisconsin Institute for Sleep and Consciousness, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Jakob HohwyMonash Centre for Consciousness and Contemplative Studies, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
TWCF: INTREPID Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Active inference, a first-principles framework for modelling the behaviour of sentient agents, is beginning to be applied in consciousness research. One hypothesis arising from the framework is that active inference is necessary for changes in conscious content. As one component of an extensive adversarial collaboration among competing theories of consciousness, active inference will be contrasted with two other theories of consciousness, neither of which posit that active inference is necessary for consciousness. Here, we thus present a Study Protocol designed to test the active inference hypothesis using a carefully controlled adaptation of the motion-induced blindness paradigm, where an 'active' condition with richer active inference is contrasted with a 'passive' condition. In the active condition, participants direct their gaze towards a target stimulus following its disappearance from consciousness, and report on its subsequent reappearance. In the passive condition, participants maintain central fixation, while the stimulus array is moved across the visual field (in a replay of the active condition based on eye-tracking data acquired during active trials). In two experiments, we plan to investigate target reappearance across active and passive conditions to evaluate the contribution of active inference to conscious awareness. Results will eventually be considered in the context of all the experiments conducted as part of the overall adversarial collaboration.

Indexed as

AwarenessConsciousnessAdultEye MovementsFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41343515
PMCPMC12677518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.